Stats.....
- 300,000 Chinese soldiers and civilians were killed.
- 20,000 women and children were raped
50,000 people were killed at this incident
2. Annihilation In The City
more than 100,000 refugees and soldiers were killed
3. Mass Execution Of Captives
10,000 young men were killed
4. Raping
20,000 women were raped then killed afterwards
5. More Stats....
China argues that 150,000 victims of 340,000 were buried by one of the two Chinese charity groups
facts......
- rape of women and girls (under 18) and pregnant
- torture of men and women
- use of men tied up to wooden posts for bayonnet (knife) practice by Japanese army
- medical experiments on the population
- cut off body parts of people and let them bleed to death
- used Chinese men as slave workers
- used Chinese women as "comfort women" for army (prostitutes)
- used men for clearing minefields
- killed a total of 10 million in Manchuria alone
- used men and women to train Japanese army dogs for killing
More Information.......
China had fixed the number of victims in what they call Nanjing Massacre at 340,000 even before they were merely able to gather what it insists “evidence.”
China argues that 150,000 victims of 340,000 were buried by one of the two Chinese charity groups which were said to be engaged in the burial task, however no Chinese has ever been able to offer a plausible explanation as to why not even a single burial site has been found to this day nor can they present a decent evidence that prove the real activities by one of the charity groups.
With only a piece of paper in which a mere number (150,000) was written down, China has been arguing Japan for committing the mass murder with not knowing even a single burial site or big holes where those massive amount of skeletons were dumped.
How can anyone with a brain believe such a nonsense?
Don't get me wrong. I never said there were no civilian casualties, it was war, no surprise there were many civilian casualties in the course of the battle between Chinese and Japanese soldiers. It was a collateral damage as seen in every war. It was horrible but can we call the killings “MASSACRE”?
It should be the Chinese Military members stationed inside Nanking who should be blamed most. The reason for that is before the battle, most of Chinese soldiers gave up fighting against the Japanese soldiers and unbelievably they flocked into a sheltery area called the Safety Zone where many innocent Chinese civilians escaped from the incoming battle. Naturally it created a very dangerous situation in the Safety Zone: mixture of Chinese civilians and soldiers.
How could those Chinese soldiers do such a wimpy, shameless action? Isn't it natural to think that the action should lead to many casualties of innocent civilians?
Had Chinese soldiers accepted surrender recommendation offered by the Japanese Army.
Had Chinese soldiers not escaped into the Safety Zone where many civilians evacuated.
Had the International Committee for Nanking Safety Zone prevented the Chinese soldiers from entering the Safety Zone.
Chinese soldiers should be blamed most.
You may call it an massacre, then you must call the incident happen in a city of China about 4 months before the Nanking incident "MASSACRE" as well. In the incident most of the Japanese residents in the city were killed (only a few survived), raped in an extremely queer way, for instance, a woman were raped and killed with a broom stabbed into her vagina, beheaded Japanese womens' heads lined up neat and tidy on the table in the cafe where they worked, intercoursed with a dead body whose head was beheaded, a corpse whose gut was dragged out, a dead child with her nose bound with wire.
This incident, naturally, stirred up the anti-Chinese sentiment among Japanese people because the nature and extent of those atrocities by the Chinese soldiers were extremely queer and beyond Japanese every imagination and ethics view.
China argues that 150,000 victims of 340,000 were buried by one of the two Chinese charity groups which were said to be engaged in the burial task, however no Chinese has ever been able to offer a plausible explanation as to why not even a single burial site has been found to this day nor can they present a decent evidence that prove the real activities by one of the charity groups.
With only a piece of paper in which a mere number (150,000) was written down, China has been arguing Japan for committing the mass murder with not knowing even a single burial site or big holes where those massive amount of skeletons were dumped.
How can anyone with a brain believe such a nonsense?
Don't get me wrong. I never said there were no civilian casualties, it was war, no surprise there were many civilian casualties in the course of the battle between Chinese and Japanese soldiers. It was a collateral damage as seen in every war. It was horrible but can we call the killings “MASSACRE”?
It should be the Chinese Military members stationed inside Nanking who should be blamed most. The reason for that is before the battle, most of Chinese soldiers gave up fighting against the Japanese soldiers and unbelievably they flocked into a sheltery area called the Safety Zone where many innocent Chinese civilians escaped from the incoming battle. Naturally it created a very dangerous situation in the Safety Zone: mixture of Chinese civilians and soldiers.
How could those Chinese soldiers do such a wimpy, shameless action? Isn't it natural to think that the action should lead to many casualties of innocent civilians?
Had Chinese soldiers accepted surrender recommendation offered by the Japanese Army.
Had Chinese soldiers not escaped into the Safety Zone where many civilians evacuated.
Had the International Committee for Nanking Safety Zone prevented the Chinese soldiers from entering the Safety Zone.
Chinese soldiers should be blamed most.
You may call it an massacre, then you must call the incident happen in a city of China about 4 months before the Nanking incident "MASSACRE" as well. In the incident most of the Japanese residents in the city were killed (only a few survived), raped in an extremely queer way, for instance, a woman were raped and killed with a broom stabbed into her vagina, beheaded Japanese womens' heads lined up neat and tidy on the table in the cafe where they worked, intercoursed with a dead body whose head was beheaded, a corpse whose gut was dragged out, a dead child with her nose bound with wire.
This incident, naturally, stirred up the anti-Chinese sentiment among Japanese people because the nature and extent of those atrocities by the Chinese soldiers were extremely queer and beyond Japanese every imagination and ethics view.